artificial intelligence

AI summaries produce ‘confident responses in a detached, authoritative tone, without clear context, and with little way to fact-check any claims. There is no author of the information, typically no citations [and] no transparency on what information the AI models have been trained upon’ (Jackson et al. 2025: 657). Thus, no guarantees exist that the information is correct or unbiased. It is therefore necessary to contrast machine-driven AI (with its opacity, centralised decision-making, monolithic knowledge, and tendency to hallucinate) to human-driven collective intelligence (with its collaborative decision-making, dialogic process, and error correction through deliberation, transparency and accountability) as performed in Wikipedia (Tarkowski et al. 2026).

See also

Would you like to know more?

Jackson, L. et al. (2025). Voice of Artificial Intelligence: Philosophical and educational reflections. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2025.2481588
Tarkowski, A. et al. (2026) Collective intelligence vs artificial intelligence. Report from the Wikimedia CH roundtable on Wikimedia and AI. Wikimedia/Open Future. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cd/Wikimedia_CH_REPORT_AI_v4_web.pdf